Specifying their organization as a member company is confusing for some users

At least some of our contributors who work for member companies are choosing the wrong option when specifying their organisation/employer.

For example:

In this (real) example, an individual has specified their employment status as "other" and typed the name of their member company employer. They should have selected "Work for a member organisation" and then the company from the pick list.

I believe that we have to assume that the notion of working for a member company is not something that even occurs to many contributors.

When specified as "Other", the system doesn't actually make a connection between the individual and the organisation, meaning that we don't get things like an MCCA association (which then leads to a proliferation of extra ECAs), organisation credit for contributions in project charts, etc..

I recommend that we revisit this UX.