-
While Apache 2.0 license is the recommended option when choosing an open source permissive (i.e. non-copyleft) license, such license is incompatible with some other open source licenses (namely, GPL-2.0) so it is not the best suited choice for patch files, since patch files are naturally intended to modify third party code, which at times may be subject to incompatible licenses. Instead of checking license compatibility on a case by case basis (which not only is time consuming, but it also a hardly maintainable/scalable process and, most important, error-prone), a more practical approach would be to adopt an open source license with the broadest compatibility possible, namely, the MIT license. Signed-off-by:Alberto Pianon <pianon@array.eu>
While Apache 2.0 license is the recommended option when choosing an open source permissive (i.e. non-copyleft) license, such license is incompatible with some other open source licenses (namely, GPL-2.0) so it is not the best suited choice for patch files, since patch files are naturally intended to modify third party code, which at times may be subject to incompatible licenses. Instead of checking license compatibility on a case by case basis (which not only is time consuming, but it also a hardly maintainable/scalable process and, most important, error-prone), a more practical approach would be to adopt an open source license with the broadest compatibility possible, namely, the MIT license. Signed-off-by:Alberto Pianon <pianon@array.eu>
Loading