Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 9f72ae10 authored by Robert Hilbrich's avatar Robert Hilbrich
Browse files

added meeting minutes

parent 1a0e5a89
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -13,31 +13,32 @@ draft: false
## Attendees
- Christoph Sommer
- Karl Schrab
- Michele Albano
- Dominik Salles
- Andreas Graf
- Jakob Kaths
- Andy Riexinger
- Michele Segata
- Michael Plagge
- Karl Schrab
- Robert Protzmann
- Jerome Harri
- Robert Hilbrich
- Robert Protzmann
- Michael Behrisch
## Real Work
### Direction of openMobility for the Future
- Where should we proceed with openMobility?
- Options for the nature of openMobility:
a) openMobility is a place to build and start a community around the topics mobility (no Budget, almost no infrastructure, no program plan, ...)
b) openMobility should be a place to specifically work towards a common goal (with a program plan, a dedicated budget, ...)
- Eclipse Foundation Working Group process requires a Working Group to have a program plan and a budget plan - which could be a form of orientation for the steering committee
- Michael P. suggests to align research initiatives in the field of mobility under the openMobility umbrella
- Jerome recommends to work in the field of advertising and marketing of open data success stories for public entities
- Christoph sees the burden and inflexibility of having a program plan
- Michele likes the free and informal exchange of ideas (in the area of SUMO)
- Robert is open towards having a program plan
- A budget plan with reasonable funds seems unlikely for everybody
c) ...
- See OpenADx program plan at <https://openadx.eclipse.org/resources/2021-OpenADx-Program-Plan.pdf>
- Jakob: could be challenging to commit to common goals for the entire working group (diverse community in openMobility - industry and academia); budget could be challenging as well; situation would change, if we get a major industry partner from the traffic domain (like Swarco, ...) to become a member in openMobility
- Robert+Karl: initial expection of having paying industry partner members did not realize; interested in visibility and joint research with MOSAIC and SUMO
- A. Graf: moving the talks to Eclipse SUMO project would be ok for him
- There is no lack of topics to discuss among the members of openMobility - but maybe not enough for a majority of all group members?
- Options to proceed:
- A) Build a program plan with minimal effort (based on OpenADx template)
- B) Do not do a program plan, but try to establish openMobility as a vendor-neutral meeting point (working group "light")
- C) Shutdown openMobility and meet as part of Eclipse SUMO or Automotive TLP
- D) Potentially fusion with other Automotive Working Groups (e.g. OpenADx or new Working Groups)
- Next steps: Robert calls Michael Plagge to discuss these options
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment