Staging feedback: LTS Provider

From #197 (closed)

/node/%lts_provider/edit

• Maintenance provider name / Company Name should be required
• URL field descriptions are misleading. These should always be external URL. It should not be possible to select an internal path for these fields.
  • Same for the Project URL
• The add LTS supported projects button should be labeled as + Add another item

/node/%lts_provider/view

• The country/Region field is missing in the description section
• Supported Project field group is missing
• Keep the Additional detail section and add the missing Submitted by: field.
• Disable comments for this content-type.

assigned to @theodoreb

mentioned in issue #197 (closed)

marked this issue as blocking #197 (closed)

changed the description

marked the checklist item Keep the Additional detail section and add the missing Submitted by: field. as completed

marked the checklist item Disable comments for this content-type. as completed

marked the checklist item Same for the Project URL as completed

marked the checklist item The add LTS supported projects button should be labeled as + Add another item as completed

marked the checklist item Maintenance provider name / Company Name should be required as completed

marked the checklist item URL field descriptions are misleading. These should always be external URL. It should not be possible to select an internal path for these fields. as completed

@cguindon there were talks of removing the LTS section, is it still worth fixing this or do we remove the section now?

I would prefer to fix it and look at removing the section post launch.

added to epic &22 (closed)

marked the checklist item The country/Region field is missing in the description section as completed

marked the checklist item Supported Project field group is missing as completed

The remaining feedback was addressed.

closed