xdc-D22

README

-             xdc-D21 (corevers:16.0.2.0; B:200,G:200,R:200)
+             xdc-D22 (corevers:16.0.2.0; B:200,G:200,R:200)
 
                        eXpanDed C Tools (XDCtools)
 
@@ -77,16 +77,25 @@ DELETIONS
 
 CHANGES
 
-core	    rearranged the code that detects function typedefs and prototypes
-	    that don't have parameters. The functionality stayed the same, but
-	    they are recognized in Type.java and the special case for them is
-	    removed from Glob.java.
+xdc.rov	    added new functionality for reading objects pointed to by a pointer
+	    and reading any memory location as it is of any chosen type
 
-	    unused modes in Glob.java - SYNMODE and CPFMODE are removed together
-	    with the related code
+xdc.runtime Assert_isTrue and the macros invokes from it had several MISRA
+	    issues, where integers were used in place of booleans, constants 
+	    were signed instead of unsigned, etc.
 
-xdc.rov	    inital version of ROV for C
+	    unsigned constants now use 'U' instead of 'u'
 
-xdc.runtime MISRA-related changes
+	    Registry used an internal signed int variable where an unsigned
+	    short was enough, and the change fixed a couple of MISRA warnings
+
+	    In Text.c, there is an operation with two unsigned short operands,
+	    which are automatically promoted to ints or unsigned ints depending
+	    on the sizes of shorts and ints. On Windows, unsigned shorts can be
+	    represented with signed ints, so the promotion causes the operation
+	    to produce a signed int as a result. This causes a warning because
+	    that result is then compared to an unsigned int.
+	    The same problem should have happened on Linux, but the compiler
+	    did not emit the warning. This may need further research.
 
 MRS

ident.c

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
  *  ======== ident.c ========
  */
 
-#define _VERS_ "@(#)*** xdc-D21"
+#define _VERS_ "@(#)*** xdc-D22"
 
 static char __NAME[] = _NAME_;
 static char __DATE[] = _DATE_;