[ Upstream commit 55b55abc ]

Kmemleak reported the below leak. When cppc_cpufreq_init went into
failure path, the cpu mask is not freed. After fix, this report is
gone. And to avaoid potential NULL pointer reference, check the cpu
value first.

unreferenced object 0xffff800fd5ea4880 (size 128):
  comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294939510 (age 668.680s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    00 00 00 00 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  .... ...........
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
  backtrace:
    [<ffff0000082c4ae4>] __kmalloc_node+0x278/0x634
    [<ffff0000088f4a74>] alloc_cpumask_var_node+0x28/0x60
    [<ffff0000088f4af0>] zalloc_cpumask_var+0x14/0x1c
    [<ffff000008d20254>] cppc_cpufreq_init+0xd0/0x19c
    [<ffff000008083828>] do_one_initcall+0xec/0x15c
    [<ffff000008cd1018>] kernel_init_freeable+0x1f4/0x2a4
    [<ffff0000089099b0>] kernel_init+0x18/0x10c
    [<ffff000008084d50>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
    [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff

Signed-off-by: Chunyu Hu <chuhu@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

[ Upstream commit 8913315e ]

When multiple CPUs are related in one cpufreq policy, the first online
CPU will be chosen by default to handle cpufreq operations. Let's take
cpu0 and cpu1 as an example.

When cpu0 is offline, policy->cpu will be shifted to cpu1. cpu1's perf
capabilities should be initialized. Otherwise, perf capabilities are 0s
and speed change can not take effect.

This patch copies perf capabilities of the first online CPU to other
shared CPUs when policy shared type is CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ANY.

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Shunyong Yang <shunyong.yang@hxt-semitech.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

The desired_perf is an abstract performance number. Its value should
be in the range of [lowest perf, highest perf] of CPPC.
The correct calculation is
  desired_perf = freq * cppc_highest_perf / cppc_dmi_max_khz

And cppc_cpufreq_set_target() returns if desired_perf is exactly
the same with the old perf.

Signed-off-by: Hoan Tran <hotran@apm.com>
Reviewed-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

This patch fixes overflow issue when calculating the desired_perf.

Fixes: ad38677d (cpufreq: CPPC: Force reporting values in KHz to fix user space interface)
Signed-off-by: Hoan Tran <hotran@apm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

When CPPC is being used by ACPI on arm64, user space tools such as
cpupower report CPU frequency values from sysfs that are incorrect.

What the driver was doing was reporting the values given by ACPI tables
in whatever scale was used to provide them.  However, the ACPI spec
defines the CPPC values as unitless abstract numbers.  Internal kernel
structures such as struct perf_cap, in contrast, expect these values
to be in KHz.  When these struct values get reported via sysfs, the
user space tools also assume they are in KHz, causing them to report
incorrect values (for example, reporting a CPU frequency of 1MHz when
it should be 1.8GHz).

The downside is that this approach has some assumptions:

   (1) It relies on SMBIOS3 being used, *and* that the Max Frequency
   value for a processor is set to a non-zero value.

   (2) It assumes that all processors run at the same speed, or that
   the CPPC values have all been scaled to reflect relative speed.
   This patch retrieves the largest CPU Max Frequency from a type 4 DMI
   record that it can find.  This may not be an issue, however, as a
   sampling of DMI data on x86 and arm64 indicates there is often only
   one such record regardless.  Since CPPC is relatively new, it is
   unclear if the ACPI ASL will always be written to reflect any sort
   of relative performance of processors of differing speeds.

   (3) It assumes that performance and frequency both scale linearly.

For arm64 servers, this may be sufficient, but it does rely on
firmware values being set correctly.  Hence, other approaches will
be considered in the future.

This has been tested on three arm64 servers, with and without DMI, with
and without CPPC support.

Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Since struct cpudata is defined in a header file, add prefix cppc_ to
make it not a generic name. Otherwise it causes compile issue in locally
define structure with the same name.

Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Compute the expected transition latency for frequency transitions
using the values from the PCCT tables when the desired perf
register is in PCC.

Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Add a function to cleanup at module exit and export
appropriate GPL string to enable moduler support
for the cppc_cpufreq driver.

Reported-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The CPU policy struct indicates the co-ordination type
for all CPUs of a common freq domain. Initialize it
correctly using the CPU specific data gathered from
CPPC ACPI lib via acpi_get_psd_map().

The PSD object is optional, so the cpu->shared_type
can also be 0. So instead of assuming any value other
than SW_ANY(0xFD) is unsupported, explictly check
if shared_type is SW_ALL and then bail.

Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The kfree() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

This driver utilizes the methods introduced in a previous
patch titled - "ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC"
and enables usage with existing CPUFreq governors.

Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>