Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
T
Trusted Content Resolver
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Requirements
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Locked files
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Test cases
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Code review analytics
Issue analytics
Insights
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Andrei Danciuc
Trusted Content Resolver
Compare revisions
main to follow-up-on-feature-file-feedback-trust-content-resolver-verification
Compare revisions
Changes are shown as if the
source
revision was being merged into the
target
revision.
Learn more about comparing revisions.
Source
andreidanciuc/trusted-content-resolver
Select target project
No results found
follow-up-on-feature-file-feedback-trust-content-resolver-verification
Select Git revision
Swap
Target
andreidanciuc/trusted-content-resolver
Select target project
neilcrossley/trusted-content-resolver
mzigldrum/trusted-content-resolver
andreidanciuc/trusted-content-resolver
fkassigk/trusted-content-resolver
snadler/trusted-content-resolver
5 results
main
Select Git revision
Show changes
Only incoming changes from source
Include changes to target since source was created
Compare
Commits on Source (1)
Clarification on Trusted Content Resolver_Verification.feature
· 62892505
Andrei Danciuc
authored
1 year ago
62892505
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
bdd/features/04.2 Trusted Content Resolver_Verification.feature
+3
-0
3 additions, 0 deletions
...atures/04.2 Trusted Content Resolver_Verification.feature
features/bdd.feature
+0
-43
0 additions, 43 deletions
features/bdd.feature
with
3 additions
and
43 deletions
bdd/features/04.2 Trusted Content Resolver_Verification.feature
View file @
62892505
...
@@ -36,4 +36,7 @@ Scenario: 00017-A1_VC validation mechanism supports multiple signature proofs (R
...
@@ -36,4 +36,7 @@ Scenario: 00017-A1_VC validation mechanism supports multiple signature proofs (R
And
the trust list is resolved
And
the trust list is resolved
And
the TCR checks that the specific entity is listed in the trust list
And
the TCR checks that the specific entity is listed in the trust list
And
the TCR will return that the claimed entity is a member of the trust framework operated by
"DNS name"
And
the TCR will return that the claimed entity is a member of the trust framework operated by
"DNS name"
And
the VC schema can be checked
And
the VC schema can be checked
# TODO: clarify: what does it mean?
# https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipse/xfsc/train/trusted-content-resolver/-/merge_requests/25#note_1323413
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
features/bdd.feature
deleted
100644 → 0
View file @
210516ae
Feature
:
Testing Trusted Content Resolver REST API
Scenario
:
Run first simple test
Given
we have XFSC TRAIN Trusted Content Resolver REST API
And
an actor X to be verified
When
we initiate a verification actor X
Then
actor X gets verified
# Scenario: Run first simple test
# Given we have XFSC TRAIN Trusted Content Resolver REST API
# And an actor X to be verified
# When we initiate a verification actor Y
# Then actor X gets verified
#
# Scenario: [IDM.TRAIN.00014] Trust Framework Configuration success
# Given A request update of trust frameworks and DID configuration is successfully reflected in the DNS Zone File (200)
# And An instantiation of a trust list is reflected in the trust list storage with possibility to retrieve via API endpoints
# When Creation of a VC is allowed with ability to sign the credential
# Then An error is provided if a record is in progress by the operator
# And Should be able to reference Trust Frameworks from other Domains
#
# Scenario: [IDM.TRAIN.00014] Trust Framework Configuration 400
# Given A request update of trust frameworks and DID configuration is successfully reflected in the DNS Zone File (200)
# And An instantiation of a trust list is reflected in the trust list storage with possibility to retrieve via API endpoints
# When A wrong context or missing data leads to an exception (400)
# And An audit entry is created
# Then An error is provided if a record is in progress by the operator
# And Should be able to reference Trust Frameworks from other Domains
#
#
# Acceptance Criteria
# The following acceptance criteria MUST be met:
# 1. Use standardized DNS resolvers
# 2. Use standardized DID resolver
#
#
# Given trust framework pointers example.federation1.de and example.federation2.de
# # 2. Issuer details from the VC/VP (e.g., DID/URI)
# #3. ServiceType of the trust list (e.g., issuance service, verifier service)
# When Navigate to listed trust framework pointers
# Then have example.federation1.de and example.federation2.de should be in trust List VC endpoint
# And have Corresponding DID mapped to example.federation1.de and example.federation2.de
# And exists DID Document of the DID
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.