Move the GEMOC consortium to the Research Page
We would like to remove the GEMOC research consortium from the WG page to add it to the Research Page. This will make more sense to most of us, including the GEMOC leader.
My idea was to consider GEMOC as a research project and have it have its own tile. WDYT?
Knowing we are currently updating the research pages, it could be a good time frame. @scorbett are you aware of this request? I alfready discussed this point with @gblondelle and @mjahn0qp Thx
Activity
assigned to @scorbett and @pkriefrvi
mentioned in issue #64 (closed)
@scorbett, if you are good with this request, I will ask @zacharysabourin to remove GEMOC from the research page.
@zacharysabourin If this request is approved, you will need to provide a PR to our membership portal: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/it/websites/membership.eclipse.org/-/blob/master/portal/src/main/resources/working_groups.json
@oliviergoulet If this request is approved, you will need to ensure that the GEMOC research consortium is added to the homepage with the work you are doing with #64 (closed)
assigned to @oliviergoulet and @zacharysabourin
added Working Groups prioritylow severitylow stateblock team:webdev labels
@cguindon I think there is confusion here: "@scorbett, if you are good with this request, I will ask @zacharysabourin to remove GEMOC from the research page." It is the opposite: We want to add GEMOC to the research page and remove it from the WG group page
Regarding your last point "@oliviergoulet If this request is approved, you will need to ensure that the GEMOC research consortium is added to the homepage with the work you are doing with #64 (closed)" Olivier has nothing to do. I plan to create a new "project" named GEMOC and provide the corresponding information in the associated file. Did you have something else in mind? Thx
-
Sorry, I created a bunch of confusion. I want to say:
@scorbett, if you are good with this request, I will ask @zacharysabourin to remove GEMOC from the WG page.
@zacharysabourin If this request is approved, you will need to provide a PR to our membership portal: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/it/websites/membership.eclipse.org/-/blob/master/portal/src/main/resources/working_groups.json
@oliviergoulet If this request is approved, you will need to ensure that the GEMOC research consortium is added to the homepage with the work you are doing with #64 (closed)This last statement is no longer valid after reading @pkriefrvi comment since hewill take care of adding the project on the research page.
TLDR; If @scorbett agrees, @zacharysabourin only needs to remove it from our portal/wg page.
@pkriefrvi Did I get it right this time?
Edited by Christopher Guindon -
@scorbett Are you good with us removing GEMOC from the WG page?
-
You did, Buddy! ;-) Thx @cguindon
unassigned @zacharysabourin
unassigned @oliviergoulet
assigned to @oliviergoulet
-
@oliviergoulet I am going to assign you to this task. At the time when I posted this both you and @zacharysabourin were working on the research website.
I can see that GEMOC is already on the homepage of https://www.eclipse.org/org/research/.
I think at this point, we simply need to make a patch to the working group API to remove GEMOC.
We also need to finalize and deploy the work that you are doing around updating the WG widget for solstice on eclipse.org to actually see this update.
-
@cguindon the research page is referencing the GEMOC studio project, not the GEMOC Research Consortium.
-
I miss understood that! @oliviergoulet We also need to add GEMOC Research Consortium to the homepage of the research website.
@pkriefrvi I am thinking that we need you to provide us the content for that if we need to create a new page + title?
removed stateblock label
marked this issue as related to eclipsefdn/it/api/eclipsefdn-working-groups-api#18 (closed)
mentioned in merge request eclipsefdn/it/api/eclipsefdn-working-groups-api!23 (merged)
moved to eclipse.org#219 (closed)
