Follow-up from "Draft: feat: Add loading cache for GH CVE data"
The following discussion from !13 (closed) should be addressed:
-
@malowe started a discussion:
This likely breaks the provider as this side steps that entire mechanism with this. As this was just for testing, as long as tests still pass, I'm not too worried about it though. We can move the stubbed service to be under the test package and go from there instead. We can split that into a separate issue to keep you unblocked!
