Conformance-test-issues.md

@@ -46,3 +46,9 @@ The second "not allowed" comment is wrong. Abstract classes can declare non-abst
 Parent constructor call with the ': ParentClass()' syntax is only valid in the class type definition, not for the constructor call.
 
 ![image](uploads/edcc83880d76e41a035bd2f15104b4da/image.png)
+
+## NegSem_5010107_Methods_004
+
+According to the standard, 'runs on', 'mtc' and 'system' clauses precedce the 'returns' clause, so in this test the order is wrong.
+
+![image](uploads/c6c772a3bb456da3af959042b3024341/image.png)
\ No newline at end of file