Commit 3ced05f5 authored by Botond Baranyi's avatar Botond Baranyi
Browse files

Documented FIELDORDER limitation in reference guide



Change-Id: I18fa3e48c9036fe9847c33e8494ed704a653ce13
Signed-off-by: Botond Baranyi's avatarBotond Baranyi <botond.baranyi@ericsson.com>
parent 97a301c3
......@@ -2211,6 +2211,8 @@ Fields are always concatenated in increasing octet number direction. +
`FIELDORDER` has a slightly different effect than order attributes. While the `FIELDORDER` shifts the location of coded bitfields inside octets, the order attributes describes the order of the bits within a bitfield. +
There is NO connection between the effect of the `FIELDORDER` and the effects of the other order attributes.
NOTE: The attribute does not extend to lower level structures. If the same field order is desired for the fields of a lower level `record`/`set`, then that `record`/`set` also needs a `FIELDORDER` attribute.
Examples:
[source]
----
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment