From bfb5861b54dedca43aed0e0803be1f03dba1e87c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrei Gherzan <andrei.gherzan@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 12:59:05 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] SQUASH: More minor tweaks Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan <andrei.gherzan@huawei.com> --- releases/2.0/2.0.0/ip_compliance_note.rst | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/releases/2.0/2.0.0/ip_compliance_note.rst b/releases/2.0/2.0.0/ip_compliance_note.rst index bfb6885..be344b0 100644 --- a/releases/2.0/2.0.0/ip_compliance_note.rst +++ b/releases/2.0/2.0.0/ip_compliance_note.rst @@ -160,9 +160,8 @@ Public License - so the above provision seems redundant. But even if someone claimed that a proprietary firmware requires such a low-level interaction with the kernel that such firmware must be deemed as a derivative work of the kernel itself, such (alleged) non-compliance with GPL could not be avoided or excluded -by a vendor license clause - so the above provision would be useless. In either -case, you should seek legal advice on that if you need to use the affected -firmware files. +by a vendor license clause - so the above provision would be useless. You +should seek legal advice to use the affected firmware files in either case. ================================= ================================================== ======================== ============================ Source Device/driver File(s) License found in @@ -230,7 +229,7 @@ proprietary license conditions (eg. software components to support Atmel SAM L21, Altera Nios II, Cypress/Infineon PSoC6) but are not used to generate Oniro images, so they are not covered here. Should you need to add support for such hardware boards, not officially supported by Oniro, you should carefully check -hardware vendor license conditions. +hardware vendor's license conditions. Warnings for Downstream Users: Patents -------------------------------------- -- GitLab